John Obi Mikel Identifies Chelsea’s Biggest Problem: “That’s Why We Are Suffering Right Now”
Chelsea’s defensive problems have been one of the biggest talking points around the club, but former Blues midfielder John Obi Mikel believes the real issue could be sitting further forward on the pitch.
Rather than simply blaming Chelsea’s defenders for the goals being conceded, Mikel has pointed towards the lack of defensive protection in midfield as a major reason why the team is struggling.
According to the former Chelsea star, the Blues needed to bring in another defensive midfielder to give the back four greater protection.
And with Chelsea having significant money available, Mikel believes the club missed an opportunity to strengthen an area that could now be causing problems.
John Obi Mikel explains Chelsea’s midfield problem
Chelsea have invested heavily in their squad in recent years, particularly in midfield. However, Mikel believes having talented midfielders is not necessarily enough.
For him, Chelsea need players who can sit in front of the defence, win the ball, cover dangerous spaces and prevent opponents from attacking the back four too easily.
Mikel said:
“Yes, we got £125m sitting in the bank, but we failed to bring in another player and that’s why we are suffering right now.”
His comments have opened up another debate among Chelsea supporters.
While some fans have focused heavily on the defenders and goalkeeper whenever Chelsea concede, Mikel believes the midfield structure must also take responsibility.
The former Nigeria international feels that if the midfield does not provide enough protection, even a strong defensive line can eventually be exposed.
Mikel believes Chelsea need two holding midfielders
One of the most important points made by Mikel is his belief that Chelsea need two holding midfielders in order to properly protect the defence.
He explained:
“We talk about leaking goals. Yes, we can blame the defence, but you need at least two holding players to be able to shield and protect the back-four in that system.”
This is particularly interesting because Chelsea’s tactical approach requires midfielders to contribute in different phases of the game.
When Chelsea have possession, midfielders are expected to help the team control the game and progress the ball.
But when possession is lost, the same midfield must immediately react and protect the defenders.
If that transition is not handled properly, opponents can quickly find space between Chelsea’s midfield and defence.
That is where Mikel believes Chelsea are currently vulnerable.
Chelsea’s defensive problems may start in midfield
It is easy to look at a team conceding goals and immediately blame the centre-backs, full-backs or goalkeeper.
However, football is rarely that simple.
Defensive stability begins with the entire team.
The forwards have to press. The midfielders have to close passing lanes. The holding players have to protect the central areas, while the defenders must maintain their positioning.
If one part of that structure fails, the entire defensive system can become vulnerable.
For Chelsea, Mikel believes the lack of midfield protection is making life more difficult for the defenders.
Instead of allowing the back four to defend attacks with enough support, Chelsea can sometimes leave their defenders facing situations where they are exposed with too much space around them.
That could explain why simply adding another defender may not necessarily solve every defensive problem.
Why another defensive midfielder could make a difference
A natural defensive midfielder can offer a team something that attacking-minded midfielders cannot always provide.
Their job is not necessarily to score goals or create chances.
Instead, they can protect the defence, win second balls, break up counter-attacks and give the rest of the midfield freedom to move forward.
For Chelsea, that kind of player could potentially provide an extra layer between the opposition’s attack and the back four.
It would also allow other midfielders to concentrate more on progressing possession and supporting attacks without leaving the defence completely exposed.
Mikel believes Chelsea should have addressed that area before the transfer window closed.
Mikel warns Chelsea will continue to be exposed
The former Chelsea midfielder also issued a warning about what could happen if the team fails to correct the problem.
He said:
“You need that because you’re going to be exposed.”
That warning is particularly significant because Chelsea cannot afford to keep conceding avoidable goals if they want to compete consistently at the highest level.
Modern Premier League football is extremely fast.
A single misplaced pass or lost duel in midfield can quickly turn into a dangerous attack.
If there is no midfielder available to slow the opposition down, the defenders can suddenly find themselves running towards their own goal.
That is exactly the kind of situation Mikel believes Chelsea must avoid.
Is Chelsea’s defence really the biggest problem?
Mikel’s comments raise an important question for Chelsea supporters.
Is the defence actually the main problem, or are the defenders simply being exposed because of what is happening in front of them?
Chelsea have already shown that they can produce strong defensive performances when the entire team is compact and organised.
But consistency is the challenge.
If Chelsea are going to play a system that leaves space behind the midfield at certain moments, the players in front of the defence have to be disciplined.
The holding midfielders must know when to stay back, when to press and when to cover for teammates.
Without that balance, Chelsea can become vulnerable to counter-attacks and quick combinations through the middle.
Chelsea have money, but was the midfield opportunity missed?
Mikel’s biggest frustration appears to be that Chelsea had the financial resources to make another addition but did not complete the move.
His reference to £125 million sitting in the bank has naturally caught the attention of supporters.
The argument is simple: if the club identified defensive midfield as an area that needed strengthening, why not use some of those resources to bring in another player?
Of course, recruitment is never as simple as having money available.
The right player has to be available, the club has to agree on a fee, wages have to work, and the player must fit the manager’s tactical plans.
But Mikel’s point remains relevant.
If Chelsea continue to struggle defensively, supporters will inevitably look back at the transfer window and ask whether the club should have invested in another holding midfielder.
What does this mean for Xabi Alonso?
The issue also puts more attention on Xabi Alonso and his tactical setup at Chelsea.
Alonso will need to find the right balance between attacking ambition and defensive security.
Chelsea have plenty of quality in midfield, but the question is whether the current combination gives the back four enough protection.
The manager could potentially change the structure, use a different midfield combination or ask certain players to take on more defensive responsibility.
Whatever solution Alonso chooses, the objective will be the same: make Chelsea harder to play against without taking away their attacking threat.
That balance could become one of the most important tactical challenges of the season.
Chelsea fans divided over Mikel’s argument
Mikel’s comments are likely to divide Chelsea supporters.
Some fans will agree that the midfield needs to do more defensively and that another holding midfielder could give the team greater stability.
Others may argue that Chelsea already have enough midfield quality and that the real problem lies with defensive positioning, individual mistakes or the team’s overall tactical organisation.
There is also an argument that Chelsea’s problems cannot be blamed on one position.
Football is a team sport, and conceding goals is often the result of several mistakes happening during the same phase of play.
Nevertheless, Mikel has provided Chelsea supporters with another way of looking at the situation.
Instead of asking only whether Chelsea need another defender, perhaps the bigger question is whether they need better protection in front of those defenders.
Final thoughts
John Obi Mikel has offered a strong explanation for why he believes Chelsea are struggling defensively.
His argument is that the Blues cannot expect the back four to solve everything on their own.
If Chelsea want to reduce the number of goals they concede, they may need greater protection from midfield, particularly when possession is lost.
Mikel believes having two holding players could give the defence the shield it currently needs.
Whether Chelsea’s current midfield can provide that protection remains one of the biggest questions surrounding the team.
And if the defensive problems continue, the debate over whether Chelsea should have signed another defensive midfielder is only going to become louder.
Leave a Reply